<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Microsoft on Ulveon's Thoughts</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/tag/microsoft/</link><description>Recent content in Microsoft on Ulveon's Thoughts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-IE</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:34:09 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/tag/microsoft/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Microsoft doesn't love Linux</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2024-04-21-microsoft-doesnt-love-linux/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:34:09 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2024-04-21-microsoft-doesnt-love-linux/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some time ago, Microsoft &lt;a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/blog/2015/05/06/microsoft-loves-linux/"&gt;announced a surprising shift in stance&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href="https://archive.is/jHKOO"&gt;archived version&lt;/a&gt;] with their newfound affection for Linux. This marked a notable departure from the era of Steve Ballmer, whose approach was &lt;a href="https://www.theregister.com/2001/06/02/ballmer_linux_is_a_cancer/"&gt;considerably more hostile&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href="http://archive.today/swg2o"&gt;archived version&lt;/a&gt;] towards competing operating systems, including Android and Linux, and the GPL license.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>