<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Microsoft Windows on Ulveon's Thoughts</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/tag/microsoft-windows/</link><description>Recent content in Microsoft Windows on Ulveon's Thoughts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-IE</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 14:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/tag/microsoft-windows/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A eulogy for the most misunderstood Windows version</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2026-06-04-a-eulogy-for-the-most-misunderstood-windows-version/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 14:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2026-06-04-a-eulogy-for-the-most-misunderstood-windows-version/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows Vista was released in 2007. Today, nearly twenty years later, people keep believing it was a &amp;ldquo;bad&amp;rdquo; operating system. I have always disagreed with this. Yes, Windows Vista had many flaws and issues, but it was still a well-designed and dependable operating system, and represented a much needed rethink of what a desktop operating system should do.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>