<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fediverse on Ulveon's Thoughts</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/tag/fediverse/</link><description>Recent content in Fediverse on Ulveon's Thoughts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-IE</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 22:01:13 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/tag/fediverse/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fediverse and the consequences of decentralised moderation</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2025-01-21-fediverse-and-the-consequences-of-decentralised-moderation/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 22:01:13 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2025-01-21-fediverse-and-the-consequences-of-decentralised-moderation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most furries who are vaguely involved in tech have heard of the &amp;ldquo;Fediverse&amp;rdquo; or, at minimum, Mastodon, the most popular Fediverse software stack implementation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a lot to be said about Fediverse, and it is a fantastic initiative from a technological point of view. With Fediverse software, you can build communities around a topic of interest and optionally interact with other users in other instances. It lets you own your data (at least from a server operator perspective), which is clearly very different from Twitter. The communities around Fediverse instances are tight-knit, often focused on technology and topics related to minorities or marginalised communities, like LGBT or sex workers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>