<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rationality on Ulveon's Thoughts</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/category/rationality/</link><description>Recent content in Rationality on Ulveon's Thoughts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-IE</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 19:35:56 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/category/rationality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Free speech is not a noble goal to pursue</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2024-01-10-free-speech-is-not-a-noble-goal-to-pursue/</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 19:35:56 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2024-01-10-free-speech-is-not-a-noble-goal-to-pursue/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Freedom and free speech have always been topics of deep interest to me. Historically, I&amp;rsquo;ve been a firm advocate for free speech, aligning myself with &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_Party"&gt;Pirate Party&lt;/a&gt; principles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Later on, during my political explorations, I briefly ventured into libertarianism and &amp;ldquo;free speech absolutism&amp;rdquo; which led me to consider many other possible arguments, such as the right to free information from a journalistic perspective. For example: &amp;ldquo;Why should the government get to decide what kind of news I am allowed to read?&amp;rdquo; Surely, governments would have a strong incentive to not allow dissenting information that could threaten their grip on power.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>