<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Encryption on Ulveon's Thoughts</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/category/encryption/</link><description>Recent content in Encryption on Ulveon's Thoughts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-IE</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/category/encryption/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Effective security beyond encryption</title><link>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2025-05-25-effective-security-beyond-encryption/</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ulveon-thoughts-f210db.gitlab.io/p/2025-05-25-effective-security-beyond-encryption/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To highly technical audiences, it is unsurprising that Telegram is not cryptographically secure and that Signal is much better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Numerous security experts have pointed out that Telegram&amp;rsquo;s reputation as a secure messenger is primarily a result of its marketing rather than its technical architecture.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>